Suzie hadn't finished the book, so Kate, Jen and I discussed whether or not we thought the ending was 'bad' and came to the conclusion that it was supposed to be related to the wider concept of things not being quite what they seem (I had forgotten, for instance, that Arthur doesn't turn out to be Kel's Dad because it seemed so likely throughout the book that this would turn out to be the case). Lots of things are left unresolved, and the end happens when everyone is just about to come together - it leaves the schmaltzy bit where they actually come together out entirely. We also thought it was good he didn't win the trial at the Mets, because that would have been too easy - seemed more real this way.
Concept.
We gave the concept 5/10. The two narrators are two people you wouldn't expect to meet who turn out to be totally connected by one other person.
Plot
(not much of a plot) - just a journey? 5/10
Ending
Suzie abstained because she didn't reach the end. We thought it was good that it left loose ends, but maybe there were too many? Paths are just aligning and then the book stops - quite abrupt. 3/10
Cover
Some embossing, but no shiny. 8/10
Page Turner? 5/10
It wasn't unputdownable *shudder*
Reccommend it? 1/4
Jen was the only one who said she would recommend it, and she 'read' the audiobook, which may be why!
Who would we slap?
Arthur Opp's famous architect Dad because he was a meanie!
Ou est le fromage?
Getting scouted for the mets... pretty cheesy!
*NEW CATEGORY* (possibly?)
It would be better as a....
FILM (we can see the teenage party scenes working out well, and see ourselves laughing at / crying with the big feller)
The next book (December) is Stonemouth by Iain Banks, selected by Suzie.
No comments:
Post a Comment